Hi Andreas,
I have mesoscale EMD-WRF Europe+ ERA5 Mesoscale data and measurements from a mast at a distance around 1.5km.
However, the cross prediction of each other data source deviates more than 20%. What is the reason for that, topography?, roughness map, wasp parameters? I understand that measurements are more reliable than mesoscale data. But, if everything else is set up correctly, shouldn 't the two data sources cross-predict each other with less deviation? I remark that the correlation among the two data sources is very good. ( >0.8 in 10-min averaging)
Thank you
Giorgos
